Friday, June 27, 2008

Put Up Your Duqs With Jerold Duquette















There is a new bi-weekly TV show called Put Up Your Duqs on Longmeadow Community TV.

It is hosted by Jerold Duquette- the once controversial School Committee member, now prime time political commentator on LCTV.

The first airing on LCTV is Monday, June 30 at 6:30 PM (with a replay on Wednesday, July 2 at 6:30 PM).

If you prefer watching the show at your convenience and have high speed Internet, I would recommend the Web broadcast which is already available on the Put Up Your Duqs blog. The quality is quite good.

I've watched the first episode and found the show to be quite entertaining and educational. Professor Duquette and his new TV/ Internet venue promises to open much needed dialog in our town. There are plans to invite a local guest every week to discuss important issues of the day. I suspect that this show will become very popular and greatly increase the TV ratings of LCTV.

Check it out....

P.S. While his invited guest this week did have much to say, he was the hit of the show!

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Storrs Library, old but also new!






It is hard to believe that the addition to Storrs Library is already more than 16 years old!! Those of us who were here at that time remember how cutting-edge the design seemed, featuring a centralized circulation desk, a separate Reference Desk, areas for computerized catalogs, a children’s room on the main level and an elevator to the second floor.
Little did we imagine that sixteen years later, we would have seven public access catalogs, eleven Internet stations, plus wireless capacity throughout the building. Our fiction and nonfiction collections have continued to grow, adding new titles to those already on the shelves and creating a depth and range difficult to find in bookstores oriented to stocking only the latest publications. In 1997, five years after the opening of our addition, we timidly launched our first web presence at http://www.longmeadow.org. Back then we had a few sections—a very basic computerized catalog, sections on library history and policies and a Web gateway with some favorite links. Eleven years later, how things have changed! We are now at www.longmeadow.org/library with a newly designed enhanced library catalog. With a Storrs Library card not only can you search Longmeadow’s holdings from home, expand your search to all Massachusetts libraries and place online requests, but you can read summaries and reviews of most titles right from the catalog. High-quality reference databases include searchable, general interest periodicals, full-text, peer-reviewed academic and professional journals and newspaper backfiles such as the New York Times, the Boston Globe and the Springfield Republican. The website provides access to full-length downloadable videos, like the Globe Trekker videos and hundreds of audiobooks that can be downloaded and played on portable devices. One of the databases, Academic Onefile, has free downloadable podcasts from NPR and the New England Journal of Medicine. Issues and Controversies and Issues and Controversies in American History contain excellent resources for students working on contemporary issues, while Science Online provides support to the middle and high school science curricula.
I am delighted to have been invited to participate in Longmeadow Buzz. Be on the lookout for news from the Library and in the meantime, don’t forget to visit at 693 Longmeadow Street or at www.longmeadow.org/library. Farida Pomerantz/Reference

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Wild Reads at the Library

Wild Things are happening at the Storrs Library this summer. The summer reading program, part of the statewide Reads In Massachusetts program, offers kids, teens and adults the opportunity to explore the joy of reading. Parents who participate will show their children that reading is fun for everyone. The program runs from June 23 through August 8, 2008. Readers can join anytime during the program. For more information stop by the Library or visit us online.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Just when you thought it was safe to watch LCTV...

Put Up Your Duqs!

Political talk that's not for the faint of heart.

30 minutes of Jerold Duquette, no censors, no rules, no standards of decency.

Tune into the premiere on June 30th at 6:30pm, right before the Longmeadow Select Board meeting. My commentary will relate to a previous LongmeadowBuzz post from Tuesday, June 10th, regarding free speech in Longmeadow (see below).

If you miss the show on LCTV, don't despair. It will be available 24/7 at www.jeroldduquette.org. The first episode is NOW AVAILABLE to view online. Click HERE to watch.

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Analysis of election returns - 10 June 2008

Here is my brief and partial examination of the election returns for School Committee in the 10 June 2008 Longmeadow Election.

School Committee


Precinct A B C D E Total

Weigand 177 169 123 180 144 793 Second

Bruns 201 170 100 140 126 737 Third

Fitzgerald 202 171 129 161 138 801 First

Kiernan 97 65 55 142 70 429 Sixth

Sweeney 92 70 83 116 80 441 Fifth

Wray 133 153 121 160 94 661 Fourth

Blanks 164 204 137 199 157 861

Write-ins 2 2 1 5

Totals 1068 1002 750 1098 810 4728 Note: 3 ballots per voter. 3 x 1576 = 4728

Total number of voters was 1576. Turn out = 13.89% 11,349 voters were eligible.

Fitzgerald - First in A, B and C. Second in D and E. 50.8%
Weigand - First in D and E. Second in C. Third in A and B. 50.3%
Bruns - Second in A and B. Third in E. Fourth in C and Fifth in D. 46.8%
Wray - Third in C and D. Fourth in A and B and E. 41.9%


Voters A B C D E Total
356 334 250 366 270 1576

Fitzgerald
% by Pct. A56.7% B51.2% C51.6% D44.0% E51.1%

Thank you to all the voters who participated, and a thank you to all the candidates who competed.

Comments invited.

Regards,
John J. Fitzgerald

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Political Speech in Longmeadow



Last month during our town’s annual celebration of Longmeadow, known as Long Meddowe Days, the committee that organizes the event informed members of the Democratic Town Committee that the campaign signs on our Long Meddowe Days booth had to be taken down because they violated a “no political signs” policy of the committee. The fact that the Town Democratic Committee has always had a booth with signs at the event escaped the committee members recollection. In addition, the committee members at the scene claimed to have made a verbal agreement with our group not to display signs when we paid our $15 fee for the privilege of having a booth at the event.

It turns out that no such verbal agreement was made with the Town Democratic Committee or its representative, but there was some sort of arrangement between the event organizers and the Town Republican Committee. Why would the LDTC agree to pay $15 for a booth at which campaign signs were forbidden? The whole point of having a booth at the event is to introduce candidates to voters. It is the signs that attract passersby to the booth. They are, in fact, the least intrusive and most important aspect of such operations.

What were the organizers of the Long Meddowe Days event thinking? The answer to this question becomes even more difficult to understand when you consider that “signage” at the booth was the only prohibition the organizers sought to enforce. They did not say that candidates could not campaign or hand out literature or any other political activity. Allowing these other political activities, but not the display of campaign signs is very bizarre, irrational even; until you consider the agreement they made with the Town Republican Committee, who apparently agreed to confine their activities to the Community House and did not pay to have a booth at the event. This information combined with very high likelihood that it was a prominent local Republican who complained about our signs to the committee, reveals the possibility that the committee was acting out of a misplaced notion of fairness, at best, or at the behest of a prominent town Republican, at worst. Maybe the Long Meddowe Days Committee assumed incorrectly that their status as a private organization allowed them total control over the time, place, and manner of signage on the green that day. Regardless of motive, the committee’s mistake resulted in a serious violation of constitutional rights that must never be tolerated again.

Arguably just as upsetting was the very sad statement about the appalling lack of civic knowledge and civic mindedness that this incident may have revealed. The irony of a Memorial Day ceremony honoring those who have given the “last full measure of devotion” at an event where the organizers had hours earlier trampled on the very principles our military men and women fought and died for was almost too much to bear. The blank stares looking back at me when I explained this to the Long Meddowe Days committee members on the green made me feel like I was in an episode of the Twilight Zone. I only wish this frightening ignorance of the duties of citizenship were rare. Sadly, distaste for and ignorance of politics in the United States is all too common.

In my three years living in Longmeadow and serving on the School Committee I have frequently noted and expressed concern about a tendency in our small town to avoid political conflict, to suppress serious disagreements about how to run our town instead of fully airing and discussing these conflicting ideas. Too many people active in running this town simply do not want to “cause a scene” or “make a fuss.” When the president of the Long Meddowe Days Committee asked me to lower my voice because I was drawing a crowd, I had to laugh (to avoid crying) as I loudly replied that DRAWING A CROWD IS WHAT FREE SPEECH IS FOR! The idea that drawing attention to political issues is untoward or perverse is itself perverse. Heaven forbid Longmeadow families be exposed to the people who are volunteering to oversee the education of their children. In what universe could signs for school committee candidates be considered “not family friendly,” as the organizers claimed at the scene?

Immediately after the organizing committee had the Longmeadow Police confiscate the signs, I phoned an attorney who has since provided a comprehensive legal analysis of the matter. While the legal analysis fully supports the position I tried to make clear to the police and the organizers at the scene, I am more outraged at the attitude of the committee members who seemed to sincerely believe that political campaign signs at the event were “inappropriate.” The fact that the Green was littered with unattended commercial signage, that were explicitly for private profit and NOT the public interest, raised no concerns for the members of the organizing committee. What kind of community suppresses democratic political speech by people willing to serve the community as members of an unpaid School Committee, but facilitates and encourages the sale of goods and services with no discernable merit for individuals or the community? If politics is not an important and welcomed part of an event that purports to celebrate our town’s place in the American mosaic, then we have surely lost our way.

I believe our town needs to do some hard introspection. We need to have a public discussion of this incident, not only to set the record straight and insure that next year’s Long Meddowe Days event really is family and Democracy friendly, but also to generate some badly needed civic involvement in our town. Too many of our residents find politics distasteful, something particularly dangerous in a town meeting form of government. The acceptance of an anti-politics mentality by many Longmeadow residents allows a small group of insiders to dominate local political decision making, something that is very unhealthy for the long term vitality of our community. Longmeadow faces very serious political problems that cannot be effectively navigated without greater participation by town residents. More of our neighbors have to do more and know more about town governance, if we are going to succeed in maintaining our town’s high quality of life.

As I write these words votes are being counted at the Community House. It appears that of approximately 11,000 registered voters in Longmeadow, only 1500 or so fulfilled the most basic responsibility of citizenship in a democracy. Im starting to think we should say to the voters; if you can't stand the heat, move to a dictatorship.

Town Election Results

Below are the final election results....

Preliminary totals show only ~ 15% voter turnout... a disappointment for such an important election. The School Committee (and Select Board) are facing some difficult decisions in the next 2-3 years.


Thursday, June 5, 2008

School Committee Candidate Debate

Here is the video if you are not able to view the School Committee Candidate debate originally shown LIVE on LCTV on June 4. Video was provided to LongmeadowBuzz through courtesy of LCTV.




Click on link below to view with your favorite video viewer.
School Committee Candidate Debate School Committee Candidate Debate

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Meet the School Committee Candidates week

Longmeadow’s Annual Town Elections will be held on Tuesday, June 10. The only contested race is for School Committee for which there are three open seats and there are six candidates running.


With a large number of important issues including adequate funding of school services and the possible renovation/ construction of a new high school facing both our town and schools, it is essential that we elect qualified people who can meet these challenges.

For the past couple of weeks LongmeadowBiz has sponsored a Meet the School Committee Candidates forum wherein each of the candidates provided a biosketch and answers to four questions. We hope that town residents have taken the time to review this information.

In addition, LongmeadowBuzz invited each of the six SC candidates to post information of interest to voters but only one candidate has so far taken that opportunity. Hopefully, as the election draws closer, we hope that we will see some commentary by the other five candidates. Comments to postings on the LongmeadowBuzz can be made by anyone with a Google account. Additional information is available for anyone interested in contributing to LongmeadowBuzz.

This coming week there are two debates with the candidates that are geared to providing town voters with additional information to make an informed vote on June 10. These events include:


June 4/ 7 PM: Face-to-face debate LIVE on LCTV- channel 12- moderated by Arlene Miller. Rebroadcast on June 5 at 7 PM, June 7 at 2 PM and June 8 at 5:30 PM. A web replay of this debate will also be available on the LongmeadowBuzz blog- by June 7.

June 6/ 2 PM- Greenwood Park Center/ Longmeadow Adult Center- Face-to-face debate moderated by Patricia Camerota

Please take the time to become an informed voter and then stop by the Longmeadow Community House between 8 am and 8 pm to cast your vote. If you cannot make it on election day, stop by the Town Hall before noontime on June 9 and cast your absentee ballot.

Let’s get a 50% voter turnout for this important election.

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Division without Conquest


There was an excellent article in this week’s Longmeadow News (May 29, 2008) called “The Making of a Politician” by Alex Grant, a Longmeadow resident who once applied to fill a School Committee vacancy. The first insight in the piece, in my view, is that we are all prone to the habits of politicians; the same habits that often frustrate and annoy us as voters – pandering and conflict avoidance.

Grant describes his interview with the Select Board and School Committee when he was seeking to fill the vacancy on the School Committee left by Paul Santaniello’s election to the Select Board. The boards will be engaged in a similar process in just a few weeks as a result of Bobby Barkett’s election to the Select Board this year.

Grant skillfully describes the ease with which we all fall into the pattern of saying what our audience wants to hear (or at least not saying what they do not want to hear), and how office seekers do so by making only the most general of promises and claims, such as the improvement of “collaborative working relationships” or “getting more aid from the state” in the case of local elections. Heaven forbid we take positions that will generate criticism or cause “divisiveness.”

Grant’s insight here that our urge to please and avoid conflict may cause us to miss the big picture would have been enough to make me think, but he goes further by describing his own encounter with “[t]he School Committee member given to histrionics” who asked him at his interview if he was “comfortable with discomfort.” He describes his inability to resist the urge to equivocate on this question in the hopes of appeasing even this School Committee member whose approach to the job he dislikes and would not seek to emulate. In so doing, he has illuminated his point with artful precision. He has shown us both how easy it is to be unintentionally ineffectual and has acknowledged the dangers of learning this lesson too well. Pointing out that too much passion can lead to “histrionics” (which may do more harm than good) makes his firsthand account at once more subtle and more instructive.

I agree with Mr. Grant that we must redouble our efforts to clarify “larger truths” and worry less about losing support. I also agree that we must be as vigilant about not trampling the trees in our drive to illuminate the forest. The task for our would-be leaders is to speak hard truths without hardening their audience’s prejudices. As the now “former” member of the School Committee “given to histrionics,” I appreciate the opportunity Mr. Grant’s thoughts have given me to reflect on these fundamental aspects of political leadership and hope that this year’s candidates and voters take time to consider them as well. I intend to devote considerable energy to the study of the question: Can political leaders divide without seeking to conquer?