Monday, January 21, 2013

Longmeadow on the Web

  
  1. Are you a Longmeadow town resident who is constantly having difficulties finding out what is happening in town? 
  2. Do you have frustrations using the "official" town website?

Check out the new "gathering place" on the web for Longmeadow residents at www.LongmeadowOnTheWeb.org


Friday, January 18, 2013

What's happening with corner lots?

I attended the Fall Special Town Meeting on October 23 with two warrant articles dealing with changes in a section of the Town Bylaws involving corner lots.  One of the articles (#13) was "tabled" at the last minute but a second warrant article (via citizen's petition) dealing with corner lots was considered by the town meeting.  Warrant article #14 was defeated after some intense heated discussion as well as strong opposition to the proposed bylaw change by the chairmen of the Planning Board (PB) and Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) (see Reminder Publication article by Chris Maza for additional details).

At the end of this STM Walter Gunn, chairman of the Planning Board (PB) promised to advance some changes in the zoning bylaws governing corner lots to provide some relief for homowners.  My wife and I left the town meeting totally confused about the issues relating to corner lots.

It should be noted that the CORNER LOT issues described below do not apply to fencing and structure changes that occurred prior to 2003 when the bylaw was changed.
________________________________________________________________
On January 9, the PB and the ZBA held a public hearing at the Longmeadow Community House to obtain feedback from town residents regarding the limitations of property use and allowed fencing with corner lots as defined by the current zoning bylaws.  In attendance was Walter Gunn, PB Chairman, David Lavenburg, ZBA Chairman and Paul Healy- Longmeadow Building Inspector.  Paul Santaniello, Select Board Chairman moderated the hearing. I attended the meeting to get a better understanding of the controversy.

Figure 1- Public Hearing- 1/09/13
 At this public hearing two diagrams were handed out to explain the issue regarding corner lots.  I have color coded these drawings for easier review and they are shown below...
Figure 2- Fencing Regulations- Standard Lot
[click to enlarge]


Figure 3- Corner Lot Description
[c
lick to enlarge]


For the majority of residential properties in Longmeadow, the REAR YARD is directly behind the HOUSE (see Figure 2 above).  SIDE YARD and FRONT YARD descriptions/ definitions are as expected and easily understood. 

For owners of CORNER LOTS, the REAR YARD is not directly behind the house and is uniquely positioned as shown in Figure 3 above.

Allowed fencing and permitted uses for each designated area with corner lots are the sections of the zoning bylaw where the major issues arise.
  1. For example, you are not permitted to build a shed or erect a playscape or pool in a SIDE YARD.  For CORNER LOT owners, this represents a strange predicament given the locations of their two SIDE YARDS.  In addition, if the house is situated somewhat differently from shown in Figure 3, the designated REAR YARD may be too small or without sufficient setback from the property line to allow construction of a desired structure.
  2. Furthermore, fencing height for SIDE YARDS is limited to 4 feet. 
Figure 4- Dr. Dennis Gordan's Infamous Fence
[click to enlarge]

A number of homeowners who had recently moved into town and attended this meeting were unaware of the above described restrictions for CORNER LOTS and expressed disappointment when they found out about restrictions on the use and allowed fencing for their property.

Mr. Gunn felt that the Longmeadow Zoning Bylaws require a major revision, particularly the sections dealing with CORNER LOTS.  Town residents in attendance as well as both chairmen (PB + ZBA) agreed that one possibility was to allow one of the SIDE YARDS to be designated by the homeowner as the REAR YARD on a CORNER LOT.

According to Mr. Gunn the agenda for the next meeting of the Planning Board on February 6 will include a discussion of corner lot zoning changes.  Mr. Gunn hopes to be able to propose a change in Zoning Bylaws covering CORNER LOTS at the May Annual Town Meeting.

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Longmeadow Adult Center Needs a Full Time Director

Update

An employment ad for the Longmeadow Director of Adult Services was posted earlier this week on the Town website. While the ad describes it as a "full time" position, the current position is budgeted at 30 hours/ week.  The Longmeadow Select Board should consider increasing the hours and salary of this position to be comparable to surrounding towns to show their commitment to a rapidly increasing segment of our population.  The ad states that this Director position will be under the general supervision of the town manager- hopefully, that means that this position is a participating member of the TM's staff.
_____________________________________________________________

The following was submitted for posting on the LongmeadowBuzz ...
_____________________________________________________________

Let your voice be heard! Be an advocate; be proactive, not reactive.

As a former member of the Longmeadow Council on Aging Board of Directors, I am very familiar with the population that is served at the Adult Center, all the services and programs provided including lunches and Meals on Wheels, and the need for a continuum of care for our senior citizens. Our senior population is the fastest growing segment of not only our town’s population but the country as a whole and its projected growth is even more substantial.

That being said, I would like to emphasize the need for a “full time” director; this is not a part time position. The Adult Center should be opened at a minimum the “typical” hours of the other town departments. The population that is served are senior citizens and not school children. Therefore the hours of 9 to 3 are unacceptable and inadequate for the population of the town. This is no longer “a mother’s hours” job.

Let me share with you the following information as a comparison:


And by the way, the town of Longmeadow is presently the ONLY town other than the little town of Hampden who does not have what would be considered a full time director and furthermore whose Council on Aging has no staff positions that are full time.

The Senior population, especially in today’s economy, needs a facility that is open to them with more hours and serviced by at least one full time staff member – which should be the new director.  May I suggest that the town hire a full time person (probably at a lesser wage than the former 25+ year employee) and expand the hours of operation at the Adult Center. That would be the ideal scenario. After all, if you are going to pay health benefits for a 30 hour employee, you might as well reap the rewards – 40 hours’ worth of work! In essence, if you replace a 30 hour person with a 40 hour person at the same or lesser wage level, you increase the productivity by 25% but you do not increase your costs. There would be absolutely no impact on the budget. That’s a win win situation. Good for the Town and good for the Seniors.

I suggest that all of us who are in favor of a Senior Center (our Adult Center) that is open 40 hours a week with a full time Director please call our Acting Town Manager, Barry DelCastilho at (413) 565-4110 and tell him so.

You can contact our Select Board at that same phone number as well. The following is a list of their email addresses:
Barry Castilho, Town Manager- bdelcastilho@longmeadow.org
Paul Santaniello, Select Board Chair, psantaniello@longmeadow.org
Mark Gold, SB member, mgold@longmeadow.org
Mark Barowsky, SB member, mbarowsky@longmeadow.org
Richard Foster, SB member, rfoster@longmeadow.org
Marie Angelides, SB member, mangelides@longmeadow.org

Let your voice be heard!  Be an advocate; be proactive, not reactive. 

Diane B. Nadeau
41 Shaker Road
Longmeadow, MA 01106

Friday, December 21, 2012

Is America Great?


In case you missed it, here is Alex Grant's article Is America Great? that appeared in the December 20th edition of the Longmeadow News (with permission of the author and thanks to the Longmeadow News). It reflects sentiments that many of us have after last week's tragedy.
____________________________________________________________ 

In the wake of the Newtown shootings, I am beginning to wonder, for the first time in my life, whether America can be a great country.  In my lifespan, we have endured the tragedy of Vietnam, the shame of Watergate, the prospect of nuclear annihilation by the Soviet Union, the shock of the 9/11 attacks, and three wars in the Middle East.  Through it all, I have remained steadfast that we are, as our Puritan forebear John Winthrop said, a "city upon a hill."  I have read the story of our nation as the history of a people called to a higher purpose, as expressed in the Mayflower Compact, the Constitution, and in our current form of government.

American courage and ingenuity, displayed for generations, from the War of Independence to World War II to the Cold War, have been placed in service to the rest of the world and to ourselves.  I have always thought that the arc of our history bends upward, and it lends credence to the idea of the perfectibility of mankind.  I question all of that now.

Whatever aspirations we may have for shared prosperity, the health and happiness of our people, or even social justice, none of them matter so long as small children can be slaughtered en masse and so long as the survivors and the rest of society must live in apprehension, and with the knowledge, that such a mass killing will happen again.  When the Declaration of Independence said that we are all endowed with the unalienable rights to "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness," it was no mistake that "Life" came first.

Life is first because everything else flows from it.  The society we hope to build in the coming years, however much we succeed in our aims, will be of no use to the Newtown children lying in the morgue.  Freedom and material prosperity count for nothing to the dead.  If we cannot provide peace and security in our cities, towns, and in our schools, if we cannot protect our young children, then we, as a people, are a disgrace.  We are a disgrace to ourselves and to our proud history.  If we cannot secure the lives of children whom we hold most dear, we are not a beacon to the world, we are a failure, and we deserve the condemnation of countries around the globe.

In decades past, we have faced mighty challenges from without, forces bent on our destruction.  We have been bloodied but not beaten.  The problem of gun violence, however, is one of our own making, and being within our control, it ought to be susceptible to solution.  But the list of mass killings has grown, they have become more frequent, and we remain paralyzed.  Places like Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora emerge from obscurity and now live in infamy, and somehow, nothing changes.

The question now is whether Newtown will be simply added to the list, or whether Americans will act, and act now, to prevent their children from being massacred.  If we do not act now, we will never act.  And while our children have, for years, been killed one by one, in incidents so commonplace that the newspapers often do not even notice, the choice of whether to live in fear, or to do something about it, has never been so clear. 

Are we so enured to gun violence, are our hearts so hardened, that even this will not awaken our consciences?  In 1929, the murder of seven Chicago mob associates on Valentine's Day was enough to spark public outrage, and that outrage led to the downfall of Al Capone, whose organization carried out the killings.  There was a time when we cared, when we refused to live amid anarchy and killing.  We have to care enough now to change, to change our hearts and our ways, to make it so that Newtown will never happen again and children will not have to live in fear.

That is the great task before us.  We have before faced and overcome greater tasks, but we cannot doubt that this is a moment of reckoning for our country.  The issue is nothing less than whether the honored dead in Newtown will die in vain.  Sympathy, prayers, and grief are not enough.  Killings like these must stop.  If the deaths of the Newtown kids do not matter, then we as a country are dead inside too, and God have mercy on us all.
_________________________________________________________

Alex J. Grant is a lawyer living in Longmeadow.  
His email address is alex.grant68@yahoo.com.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Longmeadow Property Taxes Through 2020- An Update



Now that the Longmeadow FY2013 property tax rate (or mil rate) has been set at $21.54 for FY2013, it is time for an update of my projections through 2020. See Longmeadow Buzz post for predictions made earlier this year.


These latest projections include future effects on property taxes for all of the outstanding capital projects (Proposition 2½ debt exclusions) that have been approved by Longmeadow taxpayers. They include the impact of bonds for the new LHS project + the annual 2½% increase as allowed by Proposition 2½. Property taxes for FY2014 --> FY2020 are based upon an average property assessment of $341,800 which is 3.1% lower than last year's average assessment of 352,600
.


[click chart to enlarge]

FY2013 property taxes for the average Longmeadow property owner will increase to $7362 a 6.1% increase from FY2012- following a 5.8% increase in FY2012 from F2011.

Of the $781 increase in property taxes experienced for FY2012 + FY2013, ~$473 (or 60.5%) can be attributed to the new high school project which is close to that estimated by the School Building Committee before the project was approved by voters.

According to the Longmeadow Assessors Office, updated property assessments for FY2013 will be available on the Vision Appraisal website later this month ~ December 11.  A Longmeadow property owner can calculate his FY2013 taxes as follows:
It is important to note that the FY2013 1Q (August 1) /2Q (November 1) property tax payments which have already been paid reflect estimated taxes and the upcoming February 1 (3Q) and May 1 (4Q) payments will be adjusted to reflect the new mil rate and property assessments.   While most taxpayers will see an increase in FY2013 property taxes, there will be some Longmeadow taxpayers who will see no change or even a decrease depending upon the new FY2013 property asssessments.

The above estimates do not include the Community Preservation Act charge (currently 1% surcharge) that is included with these tax bills. For the average property owner this amounts to ~ $74/year.

Projections of Longmeadow property taxes through 2020 shown in the above graph assume that there will be no Proposition 2½ overides (Operational or Debt Exclusion).  Given that there are infrastructure improvements already being discussed by the School Committee (upgrade of middle schools) and Select Board (new DPW facilities, road repairs) and significant pressure on operating budgets (e.g., salaries), it is likely that the actual increases in future property taxes will be higher than that predicted due to one or more Propositionoverrides before 2020.

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Police Officer Out at LHS

In the November 11 edition of the Sunday Repubican there was an article entitled Pharm parties leading some Western Massachusetts teens to misuse of prescription drugs suggesting drug use amongst teenagers is still a problem in western Massachusetts. It would seem logicial that the presence of a police officer at the high school might help avoid the tragic stories that are described in this article.

The article below entitled Police Officer Out at LHS written by Alex Grant appeared in the November 8, 2012 edition of the Longmeadow News and is reprinted here with permisssion of the author and thanks to the Longmeadow News.
______________________________________________________________

Last month's decision by the School Committee to remove the police officer stationed in Longmeadow High School showed two things, neither of them reflecting well on that committee.  It revealed an air of Longmeadow exceptionalism, a confidence borne of the naive belief that the problems affecting other cities and towns do not exist here.  Secondly, it laid bare the school vs. town divisiveness which so many town politicians disclaim in theory and practice in fact.

The LHS principal was on record as saying that he wanted the police officer to remain in the school.  In addition to promoting the safety and security of the school, the officer had been used in the health curriculum and to help teach forensics.  But Superintendent Marie Doyle damned the police officer, known as the school resource officer (SRO), with faint praise by saying that while she would love to retain the officer if she "had all the money in the world," the position simply was not a priority in light of all the other areas she valued more.

The School Committee debate focused on the fact that retaining the officer would "cost" the school budget $32,500 in the future, whereas now the officer is carried on the town-side budget.  To the taxpayer, it matters not a whit how the SRO is situated in the budget's line items.  For the School Committee, it mattered a great deal.  If the officer was a freebie, at least from their perspective, the majority of the members were fine with the expense.  If it cost them something from "their" budget, well, that was another matter altogether.

For years, we voters have heard the mantra, "It's one town!" from our town leaders.  But the SRO debate showed how narrowly the School Committee can look at the allocation between town and school services.  If the SRO position was worthy when it was carried entirely on the police budget, then it is worthy if it is carried partly on the schools budget.  It should not matter if it's all one town.  How many times have we heard School Committee members declare their fealty to fiscal rectitude and to looking at the needs of the whole town, and not just the school system?  When parochial budget concerns trump good policy, the "one town" rhetoric looks pretty empty.

The decision to axe the police officer could be chalked up to narrow-minded bean counting until one realizes that the school budget is over $30 million.  The cost of the police officer, which will be borne by the taxpayer in any event, was about one tenth of one percent of the total budget.  Yes, the School Committee was debating an item that was one one-thousandth of the school budget.  Mathematically, it's like the difference between batting .325 or .326 over the course of a major league season.

Undergirding the hand wringing over the placement of this salary in the overall town budget was a belief that Longmeadow High School just does not need the presence of a police officer.  John Fitzgerald said there had been no police officer in his 33 years at LHS.  The Superintendent said that a survey showed that nearly 90 percent of the students feel safe at the school. 

When East Longmeadow instituted its school resource officer program in 2006, it did so "in light of the violence that has plagued school systems throughout the country."  In 2011, when East Longmeadow began an initiative to combat underage drinking, it was spearheaded by its SRO.  Of the SRO, it was said, "Don Cavanaugh has his ear to the ground constantly. He has his finger on the pulse of the schools and we're able to head off some of these problems at the pass."

In 2010, the Ludlow school department happily paid for half the cost of a police officer.  The Ludlow School Superintendent said that the state anti-bullying law created "a tremendous need" for a school resource officer.  "We're not staffed for this," he said.

This Spring, after a Minnechaug student went public with concerns about lax drug enforcement at the high school, the Hampden-Wilbraham Superintendent said that the school resource officers at both the middle and high schools were valuable in keeping drugs out of the hands of kids.  He said, the officers "help us ensure that all reports are investigated and acted upon in accordance with state and local statutes."

So, if underage drinking, bullying, and drugs are problems in East Longmeadow, Ludlow, Hampden, and Wilbraham, surely Longmeadow is affected too.  Or is our little burb so different from the rest, so much better, so much more privileged and enlightened that we do not need a police officer in LHS?  Just recently, Longmeadow instituted an anti-bullying policy that contemplates the involvement of the school resource officer.  State law requires schools to investigate bullying complaints.  Perhaps the School Committee figures bullying has been eradicated, or that it never existed in Longmeadow.

This attitude reminds me of a recent Town Meeting when there was a proposal to impose a modest fine on those engaged in the public smoking of marijuana, a bylaw that Amherst, of all places, had passed.  The members of the Longmeadow School Committee then in office voted against it, and not coincidentally, the measure was defeated.  It was as if this problem were so far removed from the concerns of Longmeadow that it could be laughed away.

In Garrison Keillor's Lake Wobegon, "all the women are strong, all the men are good looking, and all the children are above average."  That hubris, when applied to a fictional town, is a source of humor.  Hubris, in a real town with real kids, can lead to tragedy.  If a serious bullying incident comes to light, or if drinking or drugs at LHS comes to light, the School Committee will rue the day it sent the police officer away.

Alex J. Grant is a lawyer living in Longmeadow.  His email address is alex.grant68@yahoo.com.

Friday, September 21, 2012

Changes at The Longmeadow Shops

We are lucky to have several new food establishments at The Longmeadow Shops.  Since Max Burger and Peachwave opened over the summer, there have been many more cars in the parking lot. I have never seen it so full! The place is especially crowded on Thursdays when the Farmer’s Market is open near the old Friendly’s location. The shopping area was designed long ago and it is not easy to maneuver trucks and SUVs into and out of the tight spots.  It is obviously tricky in front of Starbucks, as people get dropped off to go inside for a quick drink.

On a recent sunny September day, we sat at a table outside The Semolina Bread Company, enjoying a delicious lunch.  As we ate our wrap sandwiches, we noticed the increased congestion right away.  We counted several Connecticut cars parked near us.  I always thought the parking area was awkwardly designed; and we witnessed some bizarre traffic patterns.  Some cars were making U-turns to find spots.  Bad parking jobs were pretty typical, with people sitting in handicapped spots or double-parking near CVS.  The time has come to re-design the placement of the parking spots. It is especially complicated near the entrance to Max Burger where people drive close to the sidewalk and outdoor patio.  A speeding car could be dangerous and perhaps we need a deeper pedestrian sidewalk.

It’s almost impossible for the elderly to get into and out of the shopping area as they walk to their cars.  I also noticed people glued to cell phones and texting while walking in the lot; oblivious to the cars passing around them.  Drivers can become more aware as they enter and exit Longmeadow’s prime shopping destination, and we all can avoid talking on our phones as we park. Remember, these new restaurants are bringing in much needed business and the parking will only get worse when the winter snow piles accumulate.

Let’s welcome the changes in traffic flow and keep the place safe at the same time! I hope the management can place traffic signs within the parking area to guide the flow of vehicles, walkers and bikers.

submitted by Betsy Port

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Roadmap to a Better Town Website

The Longmeadow Select Board met last Monday night (August 6) to discuss the town website and how to improve it.  As I mentioned in an earlier Buzz post I planned to present my website recommendations to the Select Board during public comments.  Here is a copy of the email that I sent to Paul Santaniello outlining my recommendations.

Below is a short video clip (courtesy of LCTV) of my remarks during public comments....



At this Select Board meeting the first agenda item was the town website status during which Kevin Warenda, IT Director for the Town of Longmeadow discussed options for the town to consider.  Below is a shortened video version of this discussion (courtesy of LCTV):



At the end of the discussion, Mr. Warenda provided some guidance for the Select Board to use as it moves forward to improve the website.  He believes that the Select Board should not be actively involved with the operation of the town website and that it should become the prime responsibility of the Town Manager and town departments.

Below is a brief video clip (courtesy of LCTV) of his remarks:



To summarize, it would appear that "content" is being added to the town website on a regular basis but the information is not being managed very well.  The town website uses the Word Press "content management system" which provides for a robust operation.

While the Select Board did not formally develop and approve a plan forward for the town website, key "takeaways" that I heard during this discussion included:
  1. The Word Press CMS system should be continued as the platform for the town website.
  2. There is a need for a person to be appointed with responsibility for the daily operation of the website.  This person will also ensure that the information from each department is posted in a timely manner and that the homepage reflects the most current information for town residents.
  3. The Select Board should not continue their active involvement in the organization/ administration of the town website.  Website operation and performance should be a key goal for the new Town Manager and department heads.
  4. Links to community and business organizations should be considered for inclusion on the town website.

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Longmeadow Flooding Problems

Our town continues to deal with significant water and sewer (storm + sanitary) related issues on a regular basis.  In many cases the problems are caused by aging or overloaded infrastructure.  Cost estimates to fully repair the system were recently quoted by Mike Wrabel (DPW Director) at last week's Select Board meeting at $150 million (see MassLive article).  The financial impact of this infrastructure repair was discussed during the High School Building Project but was dismissed as not having a high priority by the school project advocates.

I strongly disagree.

It's interesting to note that many of the sewer/ water related problems around town are not discussed broadly and only if a major water main break or other infrastructure problem occurs that causes inconvenience to many town residents do people become broadly aware of the situation. Sometimes a water damage/ restoration service vehicle + a dumpster in a driveway are the only clues that one of your neighbors has had such a problem.

While Mr. Wrabel may claim that sewer backup problems for individual home owners do not occur very frequently, a number of my neighbors (4) can share some of the horror stories that have happened to them in the last couple of years.  Consider returning home from vacation and finding 18-24" of sewage sludge in your basement due to a backup in the sanitary sewer in the street. All four of my neighbors can relate to that experience.

At Monday's SB meeting, two of my other neighbors (Jerry and Jacqui Wise) shared their experience with a repeating horror story that has strongly affected their quality of life and pocketbook.


Below is a video clip of comments made by the Wises and their next door neighbor- Michael Scheer at Monday's SB meeting:


One interesting comment made by Mr. Wise is that this specific flooding problem had never been an issue on the street until after the Wolf Swamp Road School renovation project was completed (2003).  The Wises have lived in their home since 1996.  Neighbors across the street who are original property owners (1972) have stated that problem never occurred prior to 2005.  

Questions: Was the additional building rain runoff from Wolf Swamp Road school diverted into the Brookwood Drive storm sewer system?

Because the three incidents are considered flooding, none of the damage or possible remedial actions were covered by homeowner's insurance.

Here is a link to the formal letter with additional details that was presented by Mr./Mrs. Wise to the Longmeadow SB. It's also interesting that this specific flooding problem has not been discussed at a previous SB meeting even though the DPW has been involved since 2005.

Let's hope that this "quality of life" issue as well as financial burden for the Wises is resolved by the Town of Longmeadow.   

The Longmeadow Buzz will keep you updated.

Sunday, July 29, 2012

It’s Time to Fix the Town Website

It’s now been two years since I was fired by the Longmeadow Select Board as the “Town Webmaster” after 13 years of volunteer service.  This termination spearheaded by former SB member Rob Aseltine and supported by former SB members Christine Swanson and Bobby Barkett precipitated a significant deterioration of the usefulness of the “official” town website- www.Longmeadow.org during the past two years.  In today’s information age Longmeadow deserves better… it’s time to fix the town website.

At the July 2 meeting earlier this month Paul Santaniello, the new SB chairman, included the town website as a meeting agenda item.  Mr. Santaniello provided some background information for new SB members (Ms. Angelides, Mr. Barowsky and Mr. Foster) and highlighted that two years ago the town website was fully functional, user friendly and updated on a regular basis. Now it is much less functional and less informative. 

Mr. Santaniello who was a member of the Select Board at the time and who voted against my termination, stated at this July 2 meeting that the firing was directly related to a blog post (Mr. Moran’s personal blog/ opinion) that was connected via a link from the town website.  Rather than simply removing the “problem” link, it was decided by the majority of the SB members to fire the “volunteer” webmaster.

Thank you Paul for setting the record straight once again.  See the short LCTV video clip below for this part of the SB meeting discussion.


After two years of various failed attempts by the SB to create an effective website, there is now a discussion to hire a college student, an intern or an outside company to resolve the day-to-day management void as well as website design deficiencies.  The current approach using a combination of town department heads and other town employees to provide timely updates has not worked very well.  Kevin Warenda, Longmeadow’s IT Director has publicly stated that he sees no role for his department in supporting the day-to-day operations and the regular updating of the website.   From my experience it is likely to cost the town at least $20-30K/year to redesign and maintain an effective website.  In the past I have written a number of Buzz blog posts related to this subject.

Watch the LCTV video below to view the full SB discussion that took place on July 2.  You will find that it was very similar to others that have taken place over the past two years on this subject with SB members not knowing how to resolve the problem.


Since my firing as town webmaster, I have continued to develop the connections between town government, schools, Storrs Library, town residents, organizations and local businesses by providing new and improved Internet resources.  These include:

www.LongmeadowMA.org – A relatively new website (2010) for town residents with no business advertising.  Free website design and maintenance are offered to many town organizations including Longmeadow Historical Society, Longmeadow Newcomers Club, Longmeadow Gardeners on the Green, etc.

www.LongmeadowBiz.com – Connects local businesses and town residents. Business advertising and derived income from this website supports all LongmeadowBiz enterprises.


www.Facebook.com/LongmeadowBiz - a Facebook fan page for the town of Longmeadow where people can share information, opinions and ideas.  This Facebook fan page is constantly monitored for abusive behavior, but that has not been a problem.  The towns of Enfield, CT and East Longmeadow, MA effectively used their Facebook presence for two-way communication with town residents during the storm crisis last October.  Longmeadow should have a Facebook page for such emergencies.

People who are familiar with my efforts as the Town Webmaster
(1997 - 2010) as well as my LongmeadowBiz, LLC business activities (2004 - present) know that I have always used LongmeadowBiz web resources for the benefit of our town.  Below is a LCTV video (2011) interview that provides an overview of how it all comes together.


While I have no interest in returning to my role as the “town webmaster” I would like to propose that the Select Board consider integrating the existing LongmeadowBiz Internet resources into the town website.

Below is a proposed change in appearance for the town website to allow easy navigation by town residents.
[click image to enlarge]
  • Addition of these visible links will allow town residents to get quick access to the Longmeadow Community Bulletin Board and a wealth of other timely information and services that do not currently exist (or are not easily found) on the official town website.
  • Posting of board/ committee meeting minutes and other less timely documents to www.Longmeadow.org should continue as currently managed by town employees.
  • This proposal separates the Select Board from the difficult and time consuming task of making individual decisions regarding whether or not links to local organizations and other external resources can be added to the town website.  These links will be reviewed and managed by LongmeadowBiz.
  • If at some future time, the Select Board decides for some reason to terminate this proposed relationship with LongmeadowBiz, it can be done very easily by simply removing the links at the top of the homepage.
  • These additional Internet resources would be provided to town residents at no additional cost to the town.
I am planning to present this proposal during the “visitor comments” period at an upcoming SB meeting and hope to receive a positive response.